Gavros
1:09 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Reply Eddie B 12:51 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
you said you wouldnt hate the stadium "so much" so what other reasons apart from the distance to the pitch do you hate?
|
Your mum
1:03 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Remember when someone lobbed a cup of tea over Dennis Wise!?
|
CamHam
12:56 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
I stopped reading when I got to part about a Bilic being a cult hero. He was a rat who angled for a move away and pretty much went on strike. Never forget that.
|
Eddie B
12:51 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Gavros, eh?
|
Gavros
12:47 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Eddie B 12:45 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
Why hate it other than that?
|
Eddie B
12:45 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
I wouldn't hate the stadium so much, if we weren't so fucking far from the pitch.
|
Fo the Communist
12:33 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
And there was the inflatable sheep handed to Vinny Jones when he took a throw in.
|
Aalborg Hammer
12:19 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
I remember the last game before the Chicken Run became all seating...it was against Newcastle IIRC and Barry Venison was waiting for the ball to come out - some wag threw an oven ready chicken to him (and he caught it)
|
Gavros
12:18 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
noted, thanks.
|
Fo the Communist
12:14 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Oh, I see.
You are a bit odd, I have to say.
|
13 Brentford Rd
12:07 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
The real problem is the spivs want to have their cake and eat it.
The move was sold to fans on two main false promises. They honoured neither which is just plain foolish and greedy.
Ideally both promises should I have been honoured. All they had to do to get away with it was imho either invest appropriately in the team as promised or make sure the stadium was fit for purpose as promised. They did neither.
|
Gavros
11:49 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Just wondering Fo, as that sort of knobheaded statement usually falls into that CAMP.
|
goose
11:46 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
i guess the OS has brought a new level of expectation with it.
but the board are solely responsible for that.
|
Hammers1993
11:41 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
I wonder how many years we will use the stadium as an excuse, we lost all 3 games away from there so far by the way, in case these journos haven't realised.
Our number 1 issue currently is the manager. His decisions are the reason we are losing games, his player selections (or lack of), awful tactical set up (if any), and shocking display of lack of fitness.
Change the manager, start getting some results and the bad mood would pass.
My main criticism of the board is the fact they haven't acted earlier and replaced months ago.
|
Fo the Communist
10:26 Mon Sep 4
Re: the real problem.
|
Gavros.
No idea what you mean,.
|
bowboy
11:44 Sun Sep 3
Re: the real problem.
|
The old chicken run in the fifties was a great place to be if you could get in there. You wouldn't mess with any in there, real football fans.
|
1964
11:42 Sun Sep 3
Re: the real problem.
|
Whelks? Ha Ha Ha Ha making me feel hungry
|
Gavros
11:41 Sun Sep 3
Re: the real problem.
|
Are you in One Macs Short Short gang, Fo?
|
Roeder-nowhere
11:35 Sun Sep 3
Re: the real problem.
|
We haven't played there all season and lost the lot!Cant do anything about the stadium now so gotta live with it, what we an chanbe is the manager & at least let our feeling known about our owners those devious , lying slippery eels that are stealing not just the heart soul and core of the club but our pride & dignity too.
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
11:26 Sun Sep 3
Re: the real problem.
|
People chucking whelks at Leighton James. That's what I remember about the East Stand Lower.
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
11:24 Sun Sep 3
Re: the real problem.
|
FC Yes, mate. You posted it up as I was typing.
|
| 
